ArticleJournal of big data2026
CardiaTics: An explainable AI integrated heart disease diagnosis model with feature engineering and stacked ensemble approach.
Article in Journal of big data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An explainable machine learning framework for cardiovascular risk prediction using structured health data.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart disease is a leading global cause of morbidity and mortality. Accurate and prompt diagnoses are crucial for its effective prevention and management. Integrating multiple machine learning algorithms, this research introduces a stacked ensemble machine learning model, called CardiaTics (stands for Cardiac DiagnosTics), toward improving heart disease detection. We detect outliers and remove them as a first-step to ensure data quality and maintain integrity. Ten distinct machine learning algorithms are then individually applied, culminating in the creation of a stacked ensemble model. We use feature engineering to refine the model further applying three well-known techniques -Pearson correlation, Chi-Square Test (Chi-2), and Recursive Feature Elimination. The implementation of these techniques on the benchmark dataset results in an optimized feature set. Experimental results show that CardiaTics delivers 89.3% accuracy on raw data, and significantly improves its accuracy after feature selection to 93.3%, outperforming the individual classifiers. However, can human professionals rely on algorithms for prediction when the underlying process is not fully understood? To address concerns regarding interpretability, trust, and transparency in black-box predictions, we propose utilizing SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Explain Like I'm 5 (ELI5) in the second phase to elucidate feature importance in our model. The SHAP summary plots of CardiaTics reveal that the positive and negative contributors to heart disease are comparable, thereby enhancing the model's interpretability and reliability and helping refine the decision-making process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.