ArticleChinese herbal medicines2026
Efficacy and safety of Toujie Quwen Granules in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2: A prospective cohort study of 156 cases.
Article in Chinese herbal medicines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Given traditional Chinese medicine (TCM)'s efficacy in influenza and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), it was adopted clinically in the early stage of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection outbreak in China. However, the therapeutic effects of Toujie Quwen (TJQW) Granules in treatment of (SARS-CoV-2) infection have not been fully elucidated. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of TJQW in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 and provide evidence for clinical practice of TCM. Methods: A cohort study was conducted on SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted between 20 January and 15 March 2020. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on their clinical medication plan: TJQW combined with Western medicine (TJQW + WM) group and Western medicine (WM) group. The WM group received conventional WM treatment (antibiotics, glucocorticoids, oxygen therapy, arbidol, chloroquine, lopinavir/ ritonavir, ambroxol hydrochloride), while the TJQW + WM group received TJQW in addition to WM (15 g/bag, two bags at a time, three times a day). The incidence of severe disease and chest computed tomography (CT) findings before and after treatment were compared between groups. Dynamic analysis was performed on white blood cell (WBC) count, lymphocyte count (LYM), lymphocyte percentage (LYM%), Krebs von den Lungen 6 (KL-6) and symptom scores within 15 d of enrolment. Results: Six cases in the TJQW + WM group progressed to severe disease, with an incidence of 7.89% (6/76), while 16 cases in the WM group progressed to severe disease, with an incidence of 20% (16/80, Conclusion: TJQW could effectively decrease the incidence of severe disease, reduce pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis, and alleviate clinical symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.