Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41971590›Full record

ArticleChinese herbal medicines2026

Optimization of imperatorin extraction from Qianliexin Capsules using deep eutectic solvent.

Cejia Liu, Hezheng Bai, Jianxiang Liu, Xunyong Zhou, Ning Liang, Tao Shen, Longshan Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese herbal medicines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cejia LiuSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.
Hezheng BaiShenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, China.
Jianxiang LiuShenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, China.
Xunyong ZhouHC Enzyme Biotech. Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518001, China.
Ning LiangShenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, China.
Tao ShenSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.
Longshan ZhaoShenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: As a novel drug, Qianliexin Capsules (QLX) have promising therapeutic potential in the treatment of prostate diseases. The drug has a demonstrated efficacy on improving urinary disorders caused by diseases such as enlarged prostate, prostatitis and prostate cancer. The primary bioactive constituent in QLX is imperatorin (IMP). The objective of this study was to establish an environmentally friendly extraction process for the efficient extraction of IMP from QLX. Methods: Nine deep eutectic solvents (DESs) were systematically designed for efficient extraction of IMP from QLX. The extraction efficiency of IMP was quantitatively determined via HPLC. A sequential optimization strategy combining single-factor experiments and response surface methodology (RSM) was employed to identify the optimal extraction conditions. The Results: Under optimal conditions, the extraction yield of IMP reached 534.19 mg/g, which proves the high efficiency of DES. The Conclusion: In this study, an environmentally friendly and efficient extraction process was established and successfully applied to the extraction of IMP from QLX. The experimental results show that this method shows remarkable application potential and provides a new research idea for the extraction of QLX active ingredients.

Indexed as

antioxidant capacitydeep eutectic solventimperatorinliquid–solid extractionQianliexin Capsulesresponse surface method

Identifiers

PMID41971590
PMCPMC13069617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.