Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41971532›Full record

ArticleISME communications2026

The adaptation chip: repurposing the principles of the ichip for guiding in situ experimental evolution.

Laura M Kaminsky, Javad Sadeghi, Emily Grandinette, Terrence H Bell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISME communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura M KaminskyDepartment of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4628-4665
Javad SadeghiDepartment of Physical and Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto - Scarborough, Toronto, ON, M1C 1A4, Canada.
Emily GrandinetteDepartment of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, United States.
Terrence H BellDepartment of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil microbial ecosystems are complex and difficult to replicate in laboratory settings. It is often unclear which pressures most strongly shape microbial survival and evolution in situ, and new methods are needed to intersect the manipulative power of the lab with the reality of field environments. One recent innovation was the "isolation chip," in which many new microbial isolates could be cultured on agar within a buried diffusion chamber while exposed to environmental inputs through fine-pored membranes. Here, we created a modified version of this device containing biologically-cleared soil instead of agar, to trial an in situ reverse ecology experimental evolution approach. Using these "adaptation chips (aChips)" we exposed populations of two different soil-dwelling bacteria (

Indexed as

adaptive evolutionexperimental evolutionin situsoil microbiology

Identifiers

PMID41971532
PMCPMC13064666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.