ArticleISME communications2026
Deciphering microbial interactions using a label-free microbead sorting approach.
Article in ISME communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microorganisms form communities, and their interactions shape the function and stability of these communities. Understanding these interactions can aid in revealing ecosystem dynamics, enhancing community function, and informing the design of synthetic consortia for industrial applications. Deciphering microbial interactions is challenging due to the difficulty of culturing natural microorganisms and the exponential increase in experiments with expanding consortium size. One approach to improving culturing throughput is the use of microcompartments such as agarose microbeads. Microbead-based techniques enable the generation of large numbers of picolitre-sized compartments, facilitating high-throughput, parallel studies of microbial sub-communities. However, the existing microbead-based techniques for deciphering microbial interactions are dependent on single-culture isolates of consortium members and/or labelling of consortium members with fluorescent markers via genetic engineering. We developed a microbead-based, label-free method that eliminates the requirement of single-cell isolates to predict microbial interactions. Our method involves an isolation-independent manner of microbead inoculation with different sub-communities and microbead sorting to separate sub-communities based on growth. Using a probabilistic model, we predict interactions based on cell concentrations and relative abundances in the inoculum and after microbead sorting. We successfully predicted pairwise interactions in two three-member consortia. Additionally, we computationally showcased the validity of our approach for predicting pairwise interactions in larger consortia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.