ArticleBiochemia medica2026
Urinary placental growth factor stability as a critical factor in the reliability of preeclampsia diagnosis.
Article in Biochemia medica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Placental growth factor (PlGF) is a key biomarker for diagnosing and predicting preeclampsia (PE). While serum-based PlGF assays are well established, urine has emerged as a promising non-invasive alternative matrix. However, the absence of urinary PlGF stability data remains a major preanalytical limitation. This study aimed to assess urinary PlGF stability under common preanalytical conditions, including refrigerated storage and a double freeze-thaw cycle. Materials and methods: A prospective study was conducted using urine samples from ten pregnant women. Each sample was processed under standard laboratory conditions and aliquoted into five tubes. One aliquot was immediately frozen at - 80 °C (T0), three were stored at 2-8 °C for 48, 96, and 168 hours before freezing, and one underwent a double freeze-thaw cycle. Urinary PlGF concentrations were measured using the Elecsys PlGF immunoassay on Roche Cobas e801 analyzer. Percent degradation (PD%) was calculated relative to baseline. A linear regression model was applied to estimate the time to exceed a maximum permissible instability (MPI) of ± 10%. Results: Urinary PlGF remained stable at 2-8 °C for up to 48 hours, with a mean PD% of - 6% (95% confidence interval (CI): - 9.1 to - 2.8). The regression model (PD% = - 0.0834 x Time (h)) estimated the - 10% threshold at approximately 120 hours. After a double freeze-thaw cycle, the mean PD% was - 1.5% (95% CI: - 3.4 to 0.4%). Conclusions: Urinary PlGF shows acceptable stability for up to 48 hours under refrigeration and is stable over two freeze-thaw cycles. These findings provide essential preanalytical data supporting its potential use in clinical and research settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.