ArticleAfrican journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence2026
Determining the level of resilience amongst critical care transport professionals in a fixed-wing air ambulance environment.
Article in African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Critical care transport within a fixed-wing air ambulance environment is characterised by its demanding and unpredictable nature, distinguishing it from conventional hospital environments. Critical care transport professionals must exhibit resilience to effectively fulfil their responsibilities and excel under stressful conditions. This study examined the level of resilience amongst flight nurses, doctors, and paramedics operating in a fixed-wing air ambulance environment in Africa. Methods: A quantitative, cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted using a self-administered survey incorporating the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-25). Results: A total of 48 responses were collected in 2024 from five fixed-wing air-ambulance organisations based in South Africa. Seven constructs related to resilience were measured: hardiness, coping, adaptability and flexibility, meaningfulness and purpose, optimism, emotion regulation, and cognition and self-efficacy. Conclusion: The findings suggest that participants generally demonstrated a high level of resilience. Mean scores on the CD-RISC subscales ranged from 6.52 to 22.81, with standard deviations ranging from 1.07 to 3.44. No significant difference in resilience levels was observed between teams comprising mixed professions and those of the same profession. However, optimism was more pronounced in mixed-profession teams than in same-profession teams.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.