Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41971448›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026

Shaping next decade of systemic therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: where do we go next?

Michael Saerens, Tijl Vermassen, Jenas Stevenheydens, Willem Lybaert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael SaerensMedical Oncology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Tijl VermassenMedical Oncology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Jenas StevenheydensClinical Trials Office, VITAZ, Sint-Niklaas, Belgium.
Willem LybaertVlaamse Werkgroep Hoofd-HalsTumoren (VWHHT), Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Outcomes of patients with relapsed or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) remain poor, despite the widespread incorporation of immune checkpoint inhibitors into contemporary treatment algorithms. Although programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockade with pembrolizumab, administered either alone or in combination with chemotherapy, has become the cornerstone of first line therapy for patients with PD-L1 positive disease, durable clinical benefit is achieved in only a minority of cases. This narrative review explores the most promising systemic treatment strategies expected to shape the management of R/M HNSCC over the coming decade, including bispecific antibodies, HPV directed therapeutic vaccines, antibody-drug conjugates, and other emerging modalities. We discuss their underlying mechanisms of action, review clinical data from early phase studies, and highlight ongoing phase III trials with the potential to redefine future treatment paradigms in R/M HNSCC.

Indexed as

bispecific antibodieshead and neck squamous cell carcinomaHNSCCimmune checkpoint inhibitorimmunotherapyoncolytic vaccinestherapeutic vaccine

Identifiers

PMID41971448
PMCPMC13061717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.