ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Independent prognostic value of the gene-only BCT Score compared with the 21-gene recurrence score in ER+/HER2- early breast cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The GenesWell BCT is a prognostic assay that integrates the expression of six prognostic and three reference genes with clinicopathological factors (tumor size and nodal status) to generate a BCT Score. The BCT Score is used to predict the risk of recurrence in early breast cancer. We excluded clinical variables and developed a gene-only version of the BCT Gene Score to evaluate its independent prognostic performance. Methods: We assessed the prognostic value of the BCT Gene Score in a cohort of patients with ER+/HER2- early breast cancer using available Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS) data. The primary endpoint was concordance between the assays and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Results: We analyzed 759 samples from five Korean institutions. Risk classification concordance between the BCT Gene Score and the BCT Score was 81.2%, whereas concordance with the Oncotype DX RS was 74.2%, indicating moderate agreement. All three scores were significantly associated with RFS ( Conclusions: The BCT Gene Score exhibits independent prognostic utility and complements the original BCT Score. Risk stratification may be enhanced by incorporating both scores, ultimately guiding more precise treatment decisions in ER+/HER2- early breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.