ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Radiomics-based models to predict IDH mutation status and prognosis in gliomas using MRI: a multicenter study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Gliomas are infiltrative primary intracranial tumors with marked biological and clinical heterogeneity. Prognosis varies widely and depends on tumor grade, histopathological characteristics, and molecular alterations. Isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation is a key prognostic biomarker and is associated with improved treatment response and longer overall survival. Radiomics enables the extraction of quantitative features from routinely acquired medical images. This study evaluated radiomics-based machine learning models for noninvasive prediction of isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation status and overall survival in glioma patients. Methods: From T2-weighted MRI scans of 638 gliomas (213 from a local institution (discovery), 425 from a public dataset (validation)), 1,820 radiomics features were extracted. Machine learning models were constructed and trained on the discovery cohort and externally validated to predict isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation status. A radiomics risk score was computed using Lasso regression, and patients were stratified into high- and low-risk groups using the median radiomics risk score for Kaplan-Meier analysis. Cox regression assessed the prognostic value of radiomics risk score along with clinical features (age, sex, WHO grade, isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation status). A nomogram incorporating independent predictors to estimate 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival was assessed using the concordance index and calibration curves. Results: Logistic regression and random forest classifier models achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.90 and 0.68 in the discovery and validation cohorts, respectively, for isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation prediction using 12 top radiomic features. High-risk patients showed significantly shorter median overall survival than low-risk patients in both discovery and validation cohorts (21 vs. 30 months, 10 vs. 19.5 months, respectively; P <0.001). Age, radiomics risk score, and isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation status were significant prognostic factors (P <0.05). The nomogram achieved concordance indices of 0.83 and 0.75 in the discovery and validation cohorts, with good calibration. Conclusion: Radiomics from preoperative T2-weighted MRI enabled prediction of isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation status and overall survival in gliomas. The radiomics risk score was an independent prognostic factor and, combined with clinical variables, enabled personalized risk stratification in gliomas. External validation further confirmed the generalizability of the proposed models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.