Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41971431›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

Radiomics-machine learning model for predicting invasiveness of subcentimeter subsolid lung adenocarcinoma: a validation study with external cohort and SHAP interpretability.

Wenfeng Feng, Ruiting Chang, Tiezhi Li, Xiaolong Wang, Zhihong Gao, Xu Yang, Yuling Yin, Yuqiang Zuo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wenfeng FengMedical Imaging Center, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Ruiting ChangDepartment of Imaging Center, Harrison International Peace Hospital, Hengshui, Hebei, China.
Tiezhi LiThoracic surgery, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Xiaolong WangInformation Center, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Zhihong GaoPhysical Examination Center, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Xu YangPhysical Examination Center, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Yuling YinPhysical Examination Center, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Yuqiang ZuoPhysical Examination Center, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Preoperative discrimination of invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) from pre-invasive lesions in subcentimeter subsolid nodules (SSNs) remains challenging using conventional computed tomography (CT). We aimed to develop and validate an interpretable radiomics-machine learning (ML) model for predicting invasiveness by leveraging SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Methods: In this two-center retrospective study, 177 patients from Hospital 1 (training and internal validation) and 83 patients from Hospital 2 (independent external validation) with surgically confirmed lung adenocarcinoma manifesting as SSNs (≤1 cm) were enrolled. Radiomic features were then extracted from preoperative CT using the uAI Research Portal. Following a reproducibility assessment (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.75), the minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression were applied to select the most predictive features. Three ML classifiers: logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM) were trained and validated using a 7:3 cohort split, and the best-performing model was further evaluated in the external validation cohort. Model performance was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA). SHAP analysis was employed to provide global and local model interpretability. Results: A set of ten radiomic features was selected to predict invasiveness (IAC prevalence: 44.6%). The LR model demonstrated optimal performance during internal validation (AUC: 0.842; sensitivity: 79.2%; specificity: 73.3%; F1 score: 0.745) and exhibited superior generalizability compared to both the RF and SVM models. In the external validation cohort, the LR model maintained robust diagnostic performance, with an AUC of 0.778 (95%CI: 0.673-0.862), confirming its cross-institutional generalizability. The DCA and PRC curves further confirmed its clinical utility and stability across different institutions. SHAP analysis identified wavelet_HLL_glszm_LowGrayLevelZoneEmphasis (an indicator of necrosis), original_shape_Flatness (reflecting morphological irregularity), and log_firstorder_LoG.Minimum (suggestive of air-trapping) as top predictors of invasiveness. Decision curve analysis confirmed the model's superior clinical utility over empirical management strategies. Conclusion: The developed radiomics-LR model robustly predicts invasiveness in subcentimeter SSNs and provides biologically plausible explanations through SHAP. Its balanced performance and inherent interpretability support its potential integration into clinical workflow to aid in surgical decision-making.

Indexed as

decision curve analysisexplainable artificial intelligencelung adenocarcinomamachine learningradiomics

Identifiers

PMID41971431
PMCPMC13062904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.