ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2026
Indigenous microbiome as a key strategy for producing green chemicals.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Reactors used for conventional anaerobic fermentation (C-AF) devoted to metabolite production are typically seeded with sludge collected from anaerobic digesters. This inoculum contains methanogens, which are the principal consumers of metabolites involved in biogas production. The use of the indigenous microbial community naturally present in the agroindustrial waste (AGW) was evaluated as an alternative inoculum to take advantage of its naturally scarce methanogenic abundance. Methods: Self-AF (lacking external inoculum) and C-AF were compared in terms of bioconversion yields and metabolite profiles. The effect of pH on community specialization and product distribution was assessed across the pH range naturally occurring during self-acidification. Results: Self-AF showed high bioconversion yields to metabolites (65.7 %) when compared to C-AF (58.7 %). Nevertheless, the inherent pH changes that the process suffered from self-acidification also resulted in metabolite profile oscillation. Whereas a pH of 4.5 maximized the lactic acid and ethanol production (13.9 and 11.7 g·L Conclusion: This study demonstrated the feasibility of conducting AF in the absence of external inoculum. Moreover, the wide bacterial metabolisms present in the indigenous microbiome revealed its capability of maximizing product portfolio using self-AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.