Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41971342›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2026

Indigenous microbiome as a key strategy for producing green chemicals.

Alejandra Martorell-Múgica, Cristina Gónzalez-Fernández, Silvia Greses

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alejandra Martorell-MúgicaInstituto IMDEA Energía, Móstoles, Spain.
Cristina Gónzalez-FernándezInstituto IMDEA Energía, Móstoles, Spain.
Silvia GresesCALAGUA - Unidad Mixta UV-UPV, Department of Chemical Engineering, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Reactors used for conventional anaerobic fermentation (C-AF) devoted to metabolite production are typically seeded with sludge collected from anaerobic digesters. This inoculum contains methanogens, which are the principal consumers of metabolites involved in biogas production. The use of the indigenous microbial community naturally present in the agroindustrial waste (AGW) was evaluated as an alternative inoculum to take advantage of its naturally scarce methanogenic abundance. Methods: Self-AF (lacking external inoculum) and C-AF were compared in terms of bioconversion yields and metabolite profiles. The effect of pH on community specialization and product distribution was assessed across the pH range naturally occurring during self-acidification. Results: Self-AF showed high bioconversion yields to metabolites (65.7 %) when compared to C-AF (58.7 %). Nevertheless, the inherent pH changes that the process suffered from self-acidification also resulted in metabolite profile oscillation. Whereas a pH of 4.5 maximized the lactic acid and ethanol production (13.9 and 11.7 g·L Conclusion: This study demonstrated the feasibility of conducting AF in the absence of external inoculum. Moreover, the wide bacterial metabolisms present in the indigenous microbiome revealed its capability of maximizing product portfolio using self-AF.

Indexed as

agroindustrial wasteethanollactic acidself-anaerobic fermentationshort-chain fatty acids

Identifiers

PMID41971342
PMCPMC13066266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.