ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Cognitive sovereignty and decolonial public health: reclaiming epistemic authority in the global AI era.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes critical infrastructure for global health, it reproduces colonial patterns of extraction, mining data from the Global South to train models owned by the Global North. While international bodies like the WHO emphasize "ethical AI," they often overlook the structural violence of this digital colonialism. This perspective argues that true health equity requires more than bias mitigation; it demands cognitive sovereignty: the right of communities to govern not just their data but also the epistemic logic, interpretive frameworks, and algorithmic reasoning of the systems that analyze it. Drawing from Indigenous data governance principles (OCAP/CARE) and concrete implementation cases from Kenya, Nigeria, Rwanda, and Latin America, we demonstrate how cognitive sovereignty extends beyond data sovereignty to encompass control over knowledge production itself. By anchoring this political vision in specific technical architectures, federated learning, and community-led surveillance, we can move from extractive "AI for good" to a decolonial future of autonomous health intelligence. Recent cases from Kenya's AI health deployments and pathogen genomics illustrate both the urgency and feasibility of this transformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.