Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41971274›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Barriers and enablers to reduced meat intake and perceptions of sustainable diets, among Los Angeles County adults with low incomes: a qualitative interview study.

Katherine Baker, Avaion Ruth, Graciela Corona Rodriguez, Angela W Zhang, Wändi Bruine de Bruin, Kayla de la Haye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katherine BakerSol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Avaion RuthDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Graciela Corona RodriguezFood Systems Institute, Center for Economic and Social Research, Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Angela W ZhangFood Systems Institute, Center for Economic and Social Research, Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Wändi Bruine de BruinSol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Kayla de la HayeFood Systems Institute, Center for Economic and Social Research, Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Because of the environmental impacts of meat production, sustainable eating emphasizes eating less meat, and especially less red and processed meat. Here, barriers and enablers to reducing meat intake, and perceptions of sustainable diets, were examined among adults with low income, who often face barriers to food access and choice. The implementation science framework COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behavior) model was used to contextualize the findings and inform behavior change strategies. Methods: 20 adults in Los Angeles County with low incomes (<300% FPL) participated in semi-structured qualitative interviews. Interviewees were asked about their meat intake behaviors and perceptions, barriers and enablers to reduce meat intake, including red and processed meat, and perceptions of sustainable diets. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Five major themes emerged: (1) Interviewees expressed positive attitudes toward eating less red and processed meat, (2) Self-efficacy, knowledge, and skills related to selecting and preparing alternatives enabled meat reduction; (3) Health-related concerns related to reduced meat intake, and the high cost of meat alternatives, were barriers to reduction; (4) Interest in sustainable eating was high; However, (5) sustainable diets are not the current norm, and interviewees described competing priorities and perceptions that these diets are unattainable. Barriers and enablers to meat reduction spanned different COM-B components, and barriers to sustainable eating within the "opportunity" and "motivation" components emerged through interviews. Discussion: Interviewees were interested in consuming more sustainable diets, but faced barriers to reducing their meat intake and adopting sustainable diets. For example, interviewees perceived meat reduction as an important way to save money and benefit their health, yet also expressed concerns related to the unattainability of sustainable diets and had health concerns related to meat reduction. This suggests there is a need for clear communication and education, as well as interventions that strengthen enablers while addressing unique barriers faced by urban populations with low income, such as the high cost and accessibility of plant-based foods.

Indexed as

DietFeeding BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMeatPovertyAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicLos AngelesMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchbehavior changeclimate changeLos Angeleslow incomemeat consumptionnutritionsustainable diets

Identifiers

PMID41971274
PMCPMC13064549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.