Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41971244›Full record

ReviewGastroenterology research and practice2026

A Review on the Progress and Strategies of

Yuxin Zhang, Baojun Suo, Xueli Tian, Cailing Li, Xinlu Ren, Kai Zhou, Changmin Mi, Yuxin Wang, Lingling Ma, Liya Zhou and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. A Review on the Progress and Strategies ofGastroenterology research and practice · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yuxin ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China, puh3.net.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9994-3679
Baojun SuoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China, puh3.net.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7714-0621
Xueli TianDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China, puh3.net.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9179-6267
Cailing LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China, puh3.net.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4687-8455
Xinlu RenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China, puh3.net.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4778-5373
Kai ZhouDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China, puh3.net.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9763-0895
Changmin MiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China, puh3.net.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7844-1357
Yuxin WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China, puh3.net.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6081-0651
Lingling MaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China, puh3.net.cn.
Liya ZhouDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China, puh3.net.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2064-5522
Zhiqiang SongDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China, puh3.net.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0976-419X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Methods: A literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the China Science and Technology Journal Database, and the Wanfang Database up to January 10, 2026, was conducted with the search strategy (" Results: The final literature review included 132 treatment groups from 56 studies in nine different countries or regions, with a total of 5542 patients included in the analyses. The overall eradication rates of triple regimens were unsatisfactory (72.9%, 95% CI 70.7%-75.2%). The classic quadruple therapy (PPI, bismuth, tetracycline, and metronidazole) is commonly recommended due to its relatively satisfactory efficacy and sufficient research evidence (81.4%, 95% CI 78.6%-84.2%). The mean eradication rate for other regimens containing new drugs such as minocycline, cefuroxime, sitafloxacin, vonoprazan, and rifabutin is well (> 80%). Conclusion: The classical bismuth quadruple therapy used to be the most commonly used regimen. The overall eradication efficacy of triple therapies is unacceptable. Although new drugs and regimens have emerged, their efficacy needs confirmation through more high-quality, large-scale clinical studies to identify the optimal eradication therapy regimen. Individualized treatment, particularly therapies tailored based on the results of genetic antibiotic resistance testing, represents an important direction for future research.

Indexed as

bismuth quadruple therapyeradication therapyHelicobacter pylorinew regimenpenicillin allergy

Identifiers

PMID41971244
PMCPMC13062287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.