ArticleJSES international2026
Mid-term clinical outcomes after net-like bridging arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a minimum 5-year follow-up study.
Article in JSES international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The purpose of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) is to achieve pain reduction and functional improvement for rotator cuff tears. We have adopted the net-like bridging ARCR, a double-row suture-bridge technique. The technique has demonstrated biomechanical superiority in terms of footprint coverage and contract pressure, thereby supporting clinical application. The purpose of this study is to investigate mid-term clinical outcomes and cuff integrity on magnetic resonance imaging after net-like bridging ARCR. Methods: Between 2013 and 2014, ARCR was performed on 44 patients with symptomatic full-thickness rotator cuff tears, specifically focusing on those with a maximum tear size of 20 mm or more. Of these patients, 22 patients who consented to participate and returned for follow-up evaluation at a minimum of five years post-operatively were included. The mean age at surgery was 65.8 years (range, 54.6-79.7 years). Active range of motion, clinical score, Cofield classification, and Sugaya classification were investigated. Retear was defined according to the Sugaya classification as types 4 and 5. A Results: Mean follow-up period was 71.3 months (range, 62.9-79.6 months). There were 20 males (91%) and 2 females. The Cofield classification was as follows: medium (6 cases), large (8 cases), and massive (8 cases). For active range of motion, flexion increased from pre-operative 131° ± 42° to final 159° ± 12° ( Conclusion: Net-like bridging ARCR for medium-sized or larger full-thickness rotator cuff tears (≥20 mm) results in a retear rate of 27.3%, with no new retears beyond 1 year at a mean follow-up of 71.3 months (minimum 5 years), and sustained muscle strength in patients without retear. Despite the low follow-up rate, two-time-point evaluation in large tears (≥20 mm) provides clinically relevant mid-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.