ArticleBJUI compass2026
Impact of delayed elective urological surgery: A prospective observational study.
Article in BJUI compass, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of delayed elective urological surgery: A prospective observational study.BJUI compass · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the psychological and physical impact of delayed elective urological surgeries, as limited surgical capacity has led to frequent cancellations and prolonged waiting times. Patients and Methods: Between July 2023 and September 2025, patients admitted for elective surgery completed questionnaires including the NCCN Distress Thermometer, Severity Symptom Scale (SSS), PROMIS-10 and items on delay-related complications. Primary outcomes were psychological distress (NCCN ≥4), symptom burden (SSS ≥ 3) and PROMIS-10 Global Health T-scores. Results: A total of 488 patients were analysed: 183 (37.5%) with confirmed/suspected oncological diagnoses and 304 (62.3%) non-oncological. Surgery was postponed in 51% of cases. Mean waiting time was 23.9 weeks (SD ± 19.6), longer for postponed patients (31.8 vs. 15.5 weeks; Conclusion: Prolonged waiting times and surgical postponements contribute to physical complaints and psychological distress. Persistent nursing shortages constrain capacity, emphasizing the need for long-term structural planning. Strengthening resources while maintaining patient-centred care is essential to prevent avoidable harm in elective urological surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.