ArticleJournal of the Korean Society of Radiology2026
Assessing The Predictive Efficacy of Preoperative MRI Findings in Determining the Location of Dural Defects Associated with Spinal Extradural Arachnoid Cysts.
Article in Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic utility of four preoperative MRI findings in identifying the location of dural defects associated with spinal extradural arachnoid cyst (SEAC) to optimize surgical planning. Materials and Methods: Fifteen patients with symptomatic SEAC who underwent surgery between 2003 and 2023 were analyzed retrospectively. The following preoperative MRI features were independently evaluated by two radiologists: the septation sign, extraforaminal extension with or without bone remodeling, the C-sign, and the flow-void sign. The accuracy of each finding in predicting the location of surgically confirmed dural defects was assessed. Results: The septation sign was observed in all patients (100%), with the accuracy of predicting the location of the dural defect ranging from 80% to 87%. Extraforaminal extension was also identified in all patients, with a similar accuracy of (80%-87%). The C-sign and flow-void signs were less frequently observed (40%-47% and 47%-93%, respectively), with accuracies in predicting the dural defect location ranging from 71%-83% and 71%-79%, respectively. Inter-reader agreement was highest for the C-sign and flow-void sign (100%), followed by extraforaminal extension (93%) and the septation sign (80%). Conclusion: Recognition of MRI features-the septation sign, extraforaminal extension with or without bone remodeling, the C-sign, and the flow-void sign-may aid in localizing dural defects. These imaging markers may support surgical planning for SEAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.