ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Beyond cytotoxicity: molecular mechanisms of natural products as multi-targeting modulators and chemo-sensitizers in oncology.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plant-Derived Natural Products and Selective Apoptosis: A Cancer-Cell Vulnerability-State Framework from Redox Imbalance to Membrane-Ion Dysregulation.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Molecular Profiling and Selective Pro-Apoptotic Activity of a Pruning-DerivedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Natural Products in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Rewiring the VHL-HIF Axis, Metabolic Plasticity, and Tumor-Immune Interactions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Beyond apoptosis: harnessing natural products to target alternative regulated cell death for overcoming multidrug resistance in cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Natural Medicines Modulating Tumor Perineural Invasion: Regulatory Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Natural products have historically anchored anticancer drug discovery, providing scaffold structures for essential agents like taxanes and vinca alkaloids. While these compounds are traditionally valued for their direct cytotoxicity, this reductionist perspective overlooks their capacity to modulate the intricate, redundant signaling networks that drive malignancy. Conventional chemotherapy is increasingly constrained by dose-limiting toxicities and the emergence of multidrug resistance (MDR), often driven by transporter-mediated efflux and apoptosis evasion. This mini-review advances a multi-targeting perspective, re-positioning natural products not merely as cell-killing agents, but as broad-spectrum agents and synergistic chemo-sensitizers. We critically examine evidence demonstrating how specific flavonoids, terpenoids, and alkaloids simultaneously disrupt multiple cancer hallmarks-including aberrant PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling, cell cycle progression, and the pro-tumorigenic microenvironment-thereby preventing compensatory pathway activation. Furthermore, we elucidate their translational utility as chemo-sensitizers. Mechanistically, these agents can inhibit ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, lower the apoptotic threshold by neutralizing survivin, and mitigate chemotherapy-induced organ damage. By integrating natural products into rational, evidence-based combination regimens, it may be possible to enhance the therapeutic index of standard-of-care drugs in specific preclinical models. This review argues that overcoming pharmacokinetic barriers and standardization issues will allow these pleiotropic agents to transition from complementary additives to integral components of precision oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.