Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41971045›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of kidney health and disease2026

Perspectives of People Receiving Dialysis About Climate Change and Environmentally Sustainable Kidney Care: A Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Survey in Canada.

Camilia Minville, Carven Cambry, Daphne Esquivel Sada, Éliane Boucher, Alexia Mihalache, Ximena Fabiola Iraheta Palacios, Shaifali Sandal, Caroline Stigant, Isabelle Ethier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of kidney health and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Camilia MinvilleFaculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, QC, Canada.
Carven CambryHealth Innovation and Evaluation Hub, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, QC, Canada.
Daphne Esquivel SadaHealth Innovation and Evaluation Hub, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, QC, Canada.
Éliane BoucherFaculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, QC, Canada.
Alexia MihalacheFaculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7142-5673
Ximena Fabiola Iraheta PalaciosFaculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, QC, Canada.
Shaifali SandalDivisions of Nephrology and Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1941-0598
Caroline StigantThe University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2578-0966
Isabelle EthierFaculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4909-0417

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) of kidney care providers regarding climate change, environmental impacts of kidney care and environmentally sustainable kidney care have been assessed in diverse regions worldwide, but little is known about the perspectives of people who receive dialysis therapies. We aimed to assess the KAP of people on dialysis about these subjects. Methods: An electronic KAP survey, based on a previous survey of Canadian kidney care providers, was administered to people receiving all available dialysis modalities in a single center in Canada, from December 2024 to May 2025. Results: A total of 69 people responded to the survey, of whom 67% identified as men, and 70% were undergoing in-center hemodialysis (ICHD), 14% home hemodialysis (HHD) and 16% peritoneal dialysis (PD). Most (87%) of the respondents felt informed about climate change to at least an average degree. Nearly half were either extremely or very concerned about climate change (44%) and the waste generated by dialysis treatments (43%), and the levels of concern differed across dialysis modalities. Overall, 51% of respondents never felt guilt or anxiety related to the carbon footprint of dialysis treatment. However, there were significant differences (χ Conclusions: This survey showed that most respondents receiving a dialysis therapy felt informed and at least moderately concerned about climate change. Higher levels of concern about climate change and the amount of waste generated by dialysis treatment, as well as more frequent occurrence of guilt/anxiety about the carbon footprint of dialysis were observed in people on home therapies (PD and HHD) compared with ICHD.

Indexed as

climate changeenvironmental sustainabilitygreen nephrologypatients’ perspectivessurvey

Identifiers

PMID41971045
PMCPMC13065268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.