ArticleCanadian journal of kidney health and disease2026
Evaluating the Kidney Research Scientist Core Education and National Training (KRESCENT) Program: A 20-Year Qualitative Thematic Analysis.
Article in Canadian journal of kidney health and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Kidney Research Scientist Core Education and National Training (KRESCENT) program was established to enhance kidney research capacity in Canada by providing salary support and specialized training for kidney researchers in Canada. This study is a qualitative evaluation to gain insight into participants' experiences in the program. Objective: To explore participants' perspectives of the KRESCENT program to (1) identify potential differences in perspectives between early and recent program cohorts and (2) understand perceived impact on participants' career trajectory and professional development. Design: A qualitative interview study using semi-structured interviews. Setting: Semi-structured interviews were conducted online via Zoom. Participants: Individuals who have previously completed, or who are currently enrolled in the KRESCENT program. Methods: Participants were selected through purposive sampling, and semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore their experiences in the program. Data were analysed using thematic analysis in NVivo software. Results: Participants (N = 30; M Limitations: The initial coding was conducted by a single researcher. Conclusions: This study highlights the long-term impact of the KRESCENT program on kidney research in Canada by exploring participants' experiences and valued program elements beyond traditional career milestones. Findings emphasize that structured funding programs enhanced with opportunities for mentorship, networking, and skill development significantly support career advancement. These results reinforce the importance of continued investment in KRESCENT to build kidney research capacity and suggest that similar training models could benefit other health research fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.