ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Childhood systemic glucocorticoid exposure and subsequent alterations in myocardial structure and cardiac function: a narrative review of clinical evidence.
Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Systemic glucocorticoids (GCs) remain indispensable in pediatric care, yet their potential long-term cardiovascular sequelae-particularly after exposure during developmental windows-are incompletely defined. Objective: To synthesize representative clinical evidence linking childhood/adolescent systemic GC exposure with cardiac structure remodeling, subclinical functional alterations, and longer-term cardiovascular outcomes, and to contextualize plausibly mediating pathophysiologic pathways. Evidence synthesis: Across pediatric conditions with repeated or prolonged systemic GC use, the most consistent structural signal is a time-locked, reversible myocardial hypertrophy phenotype in neonates/young infants-often observed during or shortly after dexamethasone exposure and regressing after dose reduction or discontinuation. In older children and adolescents, evidence for persistent, overt structural damage is sparse and confounded by underlying disease and treatment context. Conventional systolic indices (e.g., EF) are frequently preserved, while more sensitive metrics (tissue Doppler-derived parameters, myocardial performance index, strain) can reveal mild, subclinical systolic-diastolic impairment in selected populations (e.g., congenital adrenal hyperplasia). For "hard" adult outcomes (heart failure, coronary events, atrial fibrillation), direct longitudinal pediatric-to-adult data remain limited; however, pediatric GC exposure shows clearer dose-time associations with intermediate cardiometabolic risk factors and thromboembolic events, supporting a plausible mediated pathway to later cardiovascular disease. Conclusions: Current pediatric evidence more strongly supports transient remodeling and risk-factor clustering than definitive, irreversible cardiomyopathy. Future studies need long-horizon, indication-aware cohorts with harmonized imaging and event endpoints to quantify exposure-response relationships and identify actionable mediators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.