ArticleIEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine2026
Cardiology-Chat: A Multi-LLMs Powered System for Cardiac Diagnostic Reasoning and Clinical Support.
Article in IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases are a leading global cause of death, but their accurate diagnosis remains challenging. While Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise in assisting disease diagnosis in general, their adoption in cardiology is hindered by three critical limitations: hallucination, inadequate domain-specific reasoning, and restricted knowledge coverage. To overcome these barriers, we developed Cardiology-Chat, an LLM-based system specifically tailored for cardiology. The system employs a three-step main reasoning framework: 1) parsing user queries with Llama 3.1 8B-instruct to extract key clinical information; 2) retrieving evidence from the knowledge base via Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG); and 3) generating diagnostic conclusions using the fine-tuned Llama model. Two critical components have been developed to support the system's functionality. The first is a specialized cardiovascular vector knowledge base, constructed from multiple data sources to enhance the RAG subsystem. The second is a Chain-of-Thought-augmented dataset designed to strengthen the LLM's in-depth reasoning capabilities. In addition, multiple LLMs were adopted to mitigate the possible "self-consistency" bias. Experiments on public cardiology QA and real clinical cases demonstrated significant performance improvements, achieving 0.796 accuracy and 0.807 F1 respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.