ArticleACS omega2026
Efficient Fluoride Removal by Ce-MOFs and Ce/Mg MOFs: A Mechanistic Investigation.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adsorption is a highly effective method for eliminating excess fluoride from water. However, conventional adsorbents are constrained by limited adsorption capacities, subpar interference resistances, and low regeneration efficiencies. To overcome these limitations, this study adopts a one-pot synthesis method for the rapid preparation of Ce-based (Ce-MOFs) and Ce/Mg-based (Ce/Mg MOFs) metal-organic frameworks, yielding fluoride adsorbents with high adsorption capacities, remarkable interference resistances, and high regeneration performances. Optimal synthesis conditions comprised a Ce to terephthalic acid molar ratio of 1:5 and a Ce, Mg, and terephthalic acid molar ratio of 0.5:0.5:5 for Ce-MOFs and Ce/Mg MOFs, respectively. Both materials had removal efficiencies that exceeded 74% within a pH range of 2-10, indicating broad pH adaptability. Their outstanding F
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.