Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41970850›Full record

ArticleACS omega2026

Integrative Machine Learning and Structural Modeling Identify Multitarget Therapeutic Candidates for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.

Ran Ding, Yuan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ran DingSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou International Campus, Guangzhou 511442, P. R. China.
Yuan ZhangSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou International Campus, Guangzhou 511442, P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1624-3715

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive and fatal lung disease characterized by marked cellular heterogeneity and dysregulated signaling networks, which pose substantial challenges for therapeutic development. To address these complexities, we developed an integrative computational framework that combines machine learning-based ligand prediction, single-cell transcriptomic analysis, genetic causal inference, and structure-based molecular modeling to prioritize multitarget therapeutic candidates for IPF. Using curated molecular activity data sets, target-specific machine learning models were constructed to predict compounds with potential activity against 13 IPF-associated receptor tyrosine kinases implicated in fibrotic remodeling. Several clinically used kinase inhibitors were identified among the top-ranked candidates, suggesting potential multitarget activity profiles. Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis further revealed that these targets are enriched in stromal and immune cell populations involved in fibrotic progression, supporting their biological relevance in the IPF microenvironment. Mendelian randomization and colocalization analyses highlighted PDGFRB as a gene with strong statistical evidence of causal association with IPF susceptibility. Molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations revealed stable predicted interactions between selected ligands and PDGFRB, providing structural support for the plausibility of these compound-target relationships. Collectively, this integrative framework links computational prediction with transcriptomic and genetic evidence, offering a systematic strategy for prioritizing candidate therapeutics capable of modulating multiple disease-associated pathways in IPF.

Identifiers

PMID41970850
PMCPMC13063037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.