ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2026
Unusual Presentation of Spinal Osteoid Osteoma: A Case Report.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Osteoid osteoma (OO) is a benign osteogenic tumor that most commonly affects long bones, accounting for 2-3% of primary bone tumors. Spinal involvement is relatively rare, representing 6-20% of cases, with the lumbar spine being the most frequently affected region. Typical spinal OO presents with painful scoliosis and nocturnal pain relieved by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). However, atypical presentations may occur when lesions are located adjacent to neural structures, leading to radicular symptoms and poor NSAID response. This case report describes an unusual presentation of OO in the L4 superior articular process, manifesting with back and leg pain, minimal NSAID responsiveness, and nerve root irritation. Case Report: A 17-year-old male presented with a 6-month history of back and leg pain, fluctuating between 3/10 and 7/10 in severity, with associated numbness in the L3 dermatome. Examination revealed painful paraspinal palpation and a positive straight leg raise on the right side, without motor weakness or reflex abnormalities. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated non-specific inflammatory changes, whereas computed tomography (CT) confirmed a 9 × 9 mm nidus in the right superior articular process of L4. Given the lesion's proximity to neural structures, radiofrequency ablation was deemed unsafe, and surgical excision was performed. The patient underwent open resection of the nidus with preservation of the inferior facet joint. Immediate post-operative resolution of leg pain was noted, and at 3-month follow-up, the patient reported complete resolution of both back and leg pain, with no recurrence of symptoms. Conclusion: This case highlights an atypical presentation of spinal OO, characterized by radicular symptoms and poor NSAID response due to nerve root inflammation. It underscores the importance of considering OO in the differential diagnosis of adolescent back and leg pain, even in the absence of classic features. CT imaging remains essential for definitive diagnosis, and surgical excision provides safe and effective treatment when minimally invasive options are contraindicated by lesion proximity to neural structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.