ReviewJournal of orthopaedic case reports2026
Non-neoplastic Orthopedic Pathology - A Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: From inflammatory to neoplastic disorders, a variety of pathological bone lesions can manifest. Only 0.5% of all cancer kinds are bone tumors, making them comparatively rare. Cartilaginous, osteoid, fibrous, and bone marrow components make up bone. Benign or malignant tumors can develop in any tissue. Most of the current research focuses on uncommon tumors and their even less frequent molecular events, even though the ordinary surgical pathologist evaluates significantly more non-neoplastic orthopedic pathology on a regular basis. Our observations from concentrated seminars and consultations strongly suggest that a knowledge and diagnosis gap still exists in certain non-neoplastic orthopedic disorders. Revision arthroplasty and the assessment of infection in periprosthetic joints are among the most common intraoperative consultations conducted in the United States, both in academic and private facilities. In this technique, pathologists are essential because they assist in evaluating intraoperatively whether patients need antibiotic spacers before reimplantation. Since they (and their surgeons) wrongly think that a thorough pathological evaluation yields little therapeutically important information, several pathology departments have stopped examining arthroplasty specimens. Bone tumor-like lesions are those that resemble tumors in appearance and cytogenetics but exhibit clinical behavior that suggests they are not malignant. Tumor-like bony lesions are significant because they are widespread and resemble real bone tumors, including malignant lesions, on radiographs. Materials and Methods: Major databases such as Medline were explored detailed literature search in resulting in a systematic review pertaining to non-neoplastic orthopedic pathology updates: Common problems and pitfalls and how to avoid them. Results: Six original research scientific articles dated between 2020 and 2024 pertaining to mentioned topic were highlighted. Conclusion: Although primary musculoskeletal neoplasms account for <1% of all musculoskeletal surgical pathology cases, they are disproportionately emphasized in the surgical pathology literature compared to non-neoplastic orthopedic pathology. Detailed information regarding the non-neoplastic orthopedic pathology updates: common problems and pitfalls and how to avoid them is discussed in this systematic review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.