ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2026
Comparing Locking Compression Plate and Retrograde Nail in the management of distal femur fracture: A Comprehensive Analysis.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Distal femur fractures due to their complex characteristics can give nightmares to trauma surgeons. Goal of treatment is to restore normal anatomy, achieve bone union and restore early joint movement. Both retrograde nail (RN) and locking compression plate (LCP) are used for internal fixation. However, superiority of one over other is debatable. Aims and Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare functional outcome, intra-operative parameters and complications of LCP and RN. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective comparative study conducted between August 2022 and August 2024. 46 skeletally mature patients of distal femur fracture were included in the study, out of which 23 were treated with LCP and 23 with RN. Fractures classified as AO Type A2, A3, and C1 fractures were included in the study. Hospital for special surgery knee rating scale (HSS) was used for functional outcome. Complications such as non-union, infection, anterior knee pain and knee stiffness were compared between two groups during follow-up. Results: Blood loss was significantly more in plating group, whereas radiation exposure was significantly more in nailing group. The patients were followed-up for a duration of 18 months. Knee flexion was significantly more in RN group. Early union was seen in nailing, with more cases of anterior knee pain, whereas more flexion deformity and extensor lag were observed in the LCP group. One case of each non-union and infection was seen in RN group. However, these parameters were comparable (P > 0.05). Mean HSS score at final follow-up was 77.32 ± 16.70 in the LCP group and 84.16 ± 10.23 in RN group, with no significant difference. Conclusion: Retrograde nailing comes out with better outcomes in terms of early union, less intra-operative blood loss and less post-operative complications. However, a larger study may still be needed for the results to be accepted into standard practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.