ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2026
Efficacy and Safety of Empirically Used Levonadifloxacin (Intravenous and Oral) in the Treatment of Patients with Bone and Joint Infection: A Multicentric, Investigator-Initiated Study.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Bone and joint infections (BJIs) present significant therapeutic challenges due to factors such as limited drug penetration at the infection site, biofilm formation, and concerns regarding the safety of prolonged antibiotic use. If left untreated, these infections may cause lasting disability or death. To address this, an investigator-initiated study evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of levonadifloxacin in patients with BJIs. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective, multicentric, investigator-initiated study designed to assess the real-world effectiveness and safety of levonadifloxacin, administered either orally or intravenously, in adult patients (≥21 years) with BJIs. A total of 97 participants were enrolled. The treatment duration ranged up to 28 days. That exact duration of treatment was individualized based on the patient's response and the physician's discretion. Clinical response was evaluated on days 4, 8, 14, and 25, whereas the microbiological response was assessed on day 28. Safety monitoring included clinical and laboratory assessments, and the final evaluation was conducted at the end-of-treatment (EoT) (day 28) and test-of-cure (ToC) visit (day 35). Results: Patients received levonadifloxacin for a minimum duration of 14 days (mean duration of treatment was 26.8 days). On day 4, clinical improvement (CI) was observed in 82.6% of patients, and improvement was further seen in 90.2% of patients on day 14, and CI was seen in all the patients on day 28. Significant reduction in wound size (length, width, and total wound area - from 52.2 cm2 to 11.2 cm2) was observed over a period of 28 days with levonadifloxacin (P < 0.0001) with improved mobility. Clinical cure was achieved in 97.8% at EoT and 96.4% at ToC, with no patients with clinical failure. Microbiological success reached 93.5%, with no clinical failures or notable changes in hematology, electrocardiogram, vital signs, or laboratory parameters. Its promising biofilm activity, availability of intravenous and oral formulations, high bioavailability, and adequate bone penetration make levonadifloxacin a compelling empirical choice over traditional agents such as vancomycin, linezolid, and teicoplanin. Conclusion: Levonadifloxacin (IV/oral) provided good clinical efficacy in patients with BJIs. Moreover, it was found to be safe and well-tolerated even after administration for 35 days.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.