ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2026
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Polyetheretherketone Cage or Anterior Cervical Plate: A Comparative Evaluation of Short-term Outcomes.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a widely used procedure for treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy. While anterior cervical plating (ACP) is the traditional method to ensure stability and fusion, it may be associated with increased dysphagia, adjacent segment degeneration, and hardware complications. Stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages offer a potential alternative with reduced operative morbidity. However, comparative evidence regarding their short-term clinical and radiological outcomes remains limited. The objective of this study was to compare the short-term clinical and radiological outcomes of ACDF performed using stand-alone PEEK cages versus conventional ACP. Materials and Methods: Current prospective comparative study encompassed 29 patients with cervical radiculopathy or radiculomyelopathy at C3-C7 levels. Group A (n = 14) underwent ACDF with standalone PEEK cage, while Group B (n = 15) underwent conventional ACDF with ACP. Clinical outcomes were determined by employing Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, neck pain disability index (NPDI), blood loss, operation time, Odom's criteria, and post-operative dysphagia. Radiological outcomes included fusion rates, cervical Cobb's lordosis, and cage subsidence, assessed at 1, 3, and 6 months post-surgery. Results: Both groups exhibited significant post-surgical improvements in NPDI and VAS scores (P < 0.05), with no notable intergroup differences (P > 0.05). Group A exhibited shorter operation times and less blood loss (P < 0.05). Dysphagia, fusion rates, and surgical outcomes were similar between the groups (P > 0.05). However, Group A exhibited relatively greater cage subsidence, cervical lordosis, loss of disc height, as well as fused segment angle (P < 0.05). Conclusion: ACDF with stand-alone PEEK cages demonstrated clinical outcomes comparable to ACDF with ACP fixation but showed higher rates of post-operative complications, including loss of cervical lordosis and cage subsidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.