ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2026
Delayed Esophageal Perforation 14 Years after Cervical Anterior Decompression and Fusion: A Case Report.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: We describe an exceptionally rare case of delayed esophageal perforation that developed 14 years after anterior decompression and fusion (ADF) of the cervical spine, ultimately necessitating complex revision surgery. Case Report: A 62-year-old man had undergone C5-C7 ADF and experienced favorable neurological recovery, although postoperative screw loosening was noted. Fourteen years later, he developed progressive numbness and muscle weakness. Endoscopic examination revealed an esophageal perforation adjacent to the anterior plate. Considering the coexistence of cervical myelopathy, the patient underwent C3-T2 posterior decompression and fusion, implant removal, anterior reconstruction with a fibular graft, esophageal fistula closure, pectoralis major myocutaneous flap coverage, and tracheostomy. Following rehabilitation, he was able to resume oral feeding and ambulate with a cane 8 months postoperatively. Conclusion: Esophageal perforation occurring more than a decade after ADF is extremely uncommon. In this case, chronic implant loosening was likely responsible. Because such complications often require extensive reconstructive procedures, vigilant long-term follow-up is crucial even after satisfactory early recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.