ReviewOpen medicine (Warsaw, Poland)2026
Umbilical port-site endometriosis: a case presentation and narrative review of the literature.
Review in Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Umbilical port-site endometriosis is a rare form of abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE), especially following non-gynecologic surgeries. Diagnosing AWE is challenging because it mimics other abdominal wall masses. Content: We describe a 46-year-old woman with cyclic umbilical pain and a mass at a previous trocar site, 17 years after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Her history included two earlier cesarean sections, both recognized risk factors for iatrogenic AWE. Imaging demonstrated a vascularized lesion. Surgical excision confirmed endometriosis. A narrative review of the literature (2000-2025) was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Broad inclusion criteria were applied; SANRA principles guided quality appraisal. A basic quantitative summary of reported cases was included. Summary: Twenty-seven relevant publications were included. Port-site AWE remains rare, and standardized diagnostic pathways and follow-up protocols are lacking. Most cases were managed with wide local excision with negative margins. Recurrence data are sparse due to short or absent follow-up in many reports. Outlook: Clinicians - particularly general surgeons - should consider AWE in patients with painful masses at trocar or scar sites. Although the temporal association with cholecystectomy raises suspicion, prior cesarean sections provide a more plausible etiological source in this case. Long-term follow-up and international registries are needed to better characterize outcomes of port-site endometriosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.