ArticleEndoscopy international open2026
Evaluation of time to endosonographic creation route after endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and study aims: Recently, antegrade procedures via the endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) have been developed as an alternative technique for failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography However, time required for formation of endosonography-created route (ESCR) after EUS-HGS is still unknown. To prevent adverse events (AEs) after stent removal, stent removal using the through mesh technique might be useful. The aim of this study was to evaluate time to ESCR formation. Patients and methods: Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-HGS using self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) and EUS-HGS stent removal for performing antegrade procedures were retrospectively enrolled. The primary endpoint was evaluation of the rate of ESCR formation. In the present study, EUS-HGS stent removal was attempted at approximately 14 days. Results: A total of 104 patients were enrolled in this study. EUS-HGS was performed using by partially covered SEMSs (n = 82) or fully covered SEMSs (n = 22). EUS-HGS stent removal was successfully performed in 102 patients (98.1%). Median interval prior to EUS-HGS stent removal in the study subjects was 13 days (range 12-14 days). Among patients who underwent EUS-HGS stent removal, ESCR formation was confirmed in all cases. Mean procedure time was 24.0 minutes. The rate of AEs was 2.9% (3/104)and all AEs were successfully treated conservatively. Conclusions: In conclusion, ESCR may have been established by a median of 13 days following EUS-HGS using SEMS; however, time to ESCR formation should be evaluated in a future study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.