ArticleBiomedical optics express2026
Wide-field and non-invasive imaging of brain tumours with scattered light techniques.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Erratum: Wide-field and non-invasive imaging of brain tumours with scattered light techniques: erratum.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Wide-field and non-invasive imaging of brain tumours with scattered light techniques.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability to identify tumour tissue in a label-free, contactless, and real-time manner is much needed in tumour resection surgery. Current techniques cause interruptions to surgical flow and have high false positive rates, which can cause collateral damage to healthy brain tissue. We propose laser light scattering techniques, such as diffuse correlation spectroscopy and laser speckle contrast imaging, to image mechanical stiffness differences in the brain's surface associated with tumour tissue. We validate the optimal processing technique quantitatively with a controlled experiment in which paraformaldehyde was used to induce a change in tissue stiffness in ex vivo mouse brains. We then demonstrate that the technique applies to tumour localisation using ex vivo mouse models with real tumours. Qualitative comparisons with magnetic resonance imaging indicate accurate tumour localisation using only surface stiffness changes to underlying tumours. We also demonstrate sub-millimetre precision when imaging brain slices.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.