ArticleThe British and Irish orthoptic journal2026
Asthenopia in Postgraduate Surgical Trainees: Prevalence and Correlation With Refractive and Orthoptic Parameters.
Article in The British and Irish orthoptic journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Association of asthenopia with multiple professions involving prolonged near work is well-established but asthenopia is under-reported in postgraduate surgical trainees. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of asthenopia in surgical trainees and determine the associated risk factors. Methods: This study was an institute-based observational study, conducted between July 2024 and September 2024. Out of 107 surgical trainees, 102 responded to a structured asthenopia questionnaire. Detailed ophthalmic evaluation was performed in 43 trainees who consented and presented voluntarily. Visual acuity (Snellen), cover test (near and distance), positive (PFV) and negative fusional vergence (using a prism bar at near and distance), stereoacuity (Randot), near point of convergence, near point of accommodation and accommodative amplitude (using the Royal Air Force rule) were measured. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 22. Results: The prevalence of asthenopia was found to be 67.6%. The highest prevalence was found in Ophthalmology trainees. Out of 43 who presented for orthoptic assessment, 11 were advised to pursue refractive correction. PFV near was significantly lower in trainees with asthenopia (mean = 10.1 PD) compared to those without asthenopia (mean = 15.1), p = 0.03. Conclusion: Asthenopia among surgical trainees was high. The visual precision needed for surgical procedures, lack of sleep and the extensive academic curriculum may contribute to asthenopia in surgical trainees. Routine ophthalmic and orthoptic testing may help alleviate symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.