ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2026
Trends in Self-Reported Responses to Nutrition Facts Labels Before and After Nutrition Labeling Policy Implementation: A Comparison of Adults in the United States and Mexico.
Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In 2020-2021, both Mexico and the United States implemented similar, newly formatted nutrition facts labels (NFLs). Mexico simultaneously implemented front-of-package warning labels (FoPWLs), which emphasize high amounts of less healthy nutrients described in NFLs (e.g., calories, sugar, salt, trans fat, and saturated fat) to enhance consumer understanding of nutrition information. Objectives: To evaluate these policies by comparing pre- and postpolicy trends in self-reported responses to NFLs. Methods: Annual surveys from the adult International Food Policy Study (2018-2023) were analyzed for Mexico ( Results: Trends over the transition period (compared with prepolicy) were stable within and across countries. For all outcomes, trends up to the early implementation period (compared with prepolicy) were more positive in Mexico than in the United States (i.e., ease of finding nutrition information Conclusions: Newly formatted NFLs in the United States did not increase awareness, understanding, or use of NFLs, particularly when compared with Mexico's new NFLs that were accompanied by FoPWLs. Further research should determine the labeling effects on eating behaviors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.