Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41970507›Full record

ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2026

Validation of a Brief Vegetable Variety Questionnaire to Assess Diet Quality.

Nancy L Keim, Mical K Shilts, L Karina Díaz Rios, Xiaowei Zeng, Jingzhi Sun, Christiana M Drake, Marilyn S Townsend

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nancy L KeimDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA, United States.
Mical K ShiltsDepartment of Nutrition, Food and Dietetics, California State University Sacramento, Sacramento, CA, United States.
L Karina Díaz RiosAgriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, Merced, CA, United States.
Xiaowei ZengDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA, United States.
Jingzhi SunDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA, United States.
Christiana M DrakeDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA, United States.
Marilyn S TownsendDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Obtaining estimates of food intake via the 24-h dietary recall is laborious and expensive. Simpler methods for estimating dietary quality are needed in clinical settings and for evaluating nutrition education interventions. Objectives: The objective of this study was to validate a simple, pictorial tool for assessing diet quality using vegetable variety as the indicator. Methods: The Results: Demographic characteristics did not differ between the variety groups. The LV group had lower total HEI score (median = 54.4; IQR = 15.6) than HV (62.1; 17.3) and MV (68.0; 18.6) groups (P < 0.0001 for both). The LV variety group had a higher DED score (median = 2.6; IQR = 0.4) than the HV (2.2; 0.6) and MV (2.3; 0.5) groups (P < 0.0001 for both). Both HV and MV groups reported cooking from scratch more often than LV group ( Conclusions: This study provides evidence of the convergent and criterion validity of a simple, pictorial assessment tool for evaluating diet quality based on vegetable variety. Overall, adults with lower vegetable variety scores had lower diet quality and higher body mass index and fat mass.

Indexed as

adultsclustering analysisdiet qualitypictorial assessmentvalidationvegetables

Identifiers

PMID41970507
PMCPMC13068565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.