ArticleHealth science reports2026
Knowledge and Practice Gaps in Anaemia Prevention and Management Among Patients and Health Providers in Northern Ghana: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite diverse national interventions, anaemia persists as a major public health burden in Ghana, with disproportionately high prevalence in the Northern Region. This persistence is driven by systemic inequities including limited healthcare access, socioeconomic deprivation, and cultural barriers that impede effective prevention and management. This comparative study assessed disparities in knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) between patients and healthcare providers regarding anaemia prevention and management, highlighting critical gaps in current understanding. Aim: The study aimed to: (1) assess and compare KAP levels between patients and healthcare providers, (2) detect fundamental misconceptions affecting the management of anaemia, and (3) highlight any associations between anaemia prevalence and KAP variables among participants. Methods: This cross-sectional comparative study was conducted across three healthcare facilities in Northern Ghana, involving 299 participants (141 healthcare providers and 158 patients). Structured questionnaires assessed KAP domains, and haemoglobin measurements determined anaemia status. Results: Healthcare providers demonstrated significantly higher knowledge levels, with 94.3% understanding anaemia's pathophysiological basis compared to 60.8% of patients ( Conclusions: Significant KAP disparities exist between healthcare providers and patients, with patient knowledge gaps and misconceptions substantially hindering anaemia prevention and management in Northern Ghana. Evidence-based interventions should strengthen patient-centered education programs, provide economic support for nutritional access, and implement continuous professional development for healthcare workers. Integration of these strategies into Ghana's Community-Based Health Planning and Services (CHPS) program could significantly reduce the anaemia burden in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.