ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Oxygen blenders for prevention of retinopathy of prematurity are highly cost-effective in Uganda.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blended oxygen has been shown to reduce severe retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) incidence worldwide, and more recently in Uganda. Although it has been established that ROP-driven visual impairment has a substantial societal burden and that screening and treatment programs are cost-effective in low- and middle-income countries, there is limited evidence for the economic impact of prevention with appropriate oxygen management equipment (OME) in these regions. We performed a cost-utility analysis of OME implementation comparing variations ranging between most and least favorable values. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) were calculated with a 3% discount rate. Calculations assumed a 62.1% incidence of visual impairment in untreated severe ROP and a disability weight of 0.184 for severe visual impairment due to ROP. One set of OME costs between $677.50-$1,844.11 USD in Uganda. We found that the cost to prevent one case of ROP-driven severe visual impairment in Uganda ranges from $25.55-$543.99, with a base case (best estimate) of $168.92 per case averted. This reflects 5.18 DALYs averted over the 58-year average Ugandan lifespan and a cost of $4.97-$104.98 to avert one DALY, with a base case of $32.60 per DALY averted. In comparison, prevention of malaria via mosquito net distribution was estimated in a 2020 meta-analysis to cost $50 for every DALY averted. The high-end estimate is roughly 10% of the annual gross domestic product per capita ($1,002.30). Therefore, OME is a cost-effective means to prevent severe visual impairment among infants in Uganda. Implementation of OME in Uganda would also reflect a clear ethical and humanitarian success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.