ArticleJPRAS open2026
Double jersey finger: A systematic review and case series.
Article in JPRAS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Closed flexor tendon avulsions typically affect the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) from hyperextension of a flexed finger. Avulsion of both the FDP and flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) in the same finger is rare and complicates surgery and prognosis. Methods: This case study details a simultaneous FDP and FDS rupture, emphasizing accurate diagnosis and surgery. A systematic review of English case studies on presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes was conducted, following 2020 PRISMA guidelines. Case series: A 40-year-old male developed jersey finger following an assault, and a 26-year-old male sustained a similar injury while playing Australian Rules football. Both had simultaneous FDP and FDS tendon avulsions successfully treated with micro-Mitek suture anchors and early active mobilization. Results: The PRISMA flow diagram started with 70 records, 7 duplicates were removed, and 26 were excluded for measuring unintended outcomes, leaving 37 for screening. After excluding 14 cases that focused on single tendon ruptures, 23 were assessed for eligibility. Seven more were removed due to translation issues or lack of access, resulting in 16 studies included in the review. Discussion: This case documents a successful primary repair over 3 weeks post-injury. A review of 24 cases highlights the advantages of using micro-Mitek suture anchors for repair, which enhance strength and early mobilization for better functional recovery. Conclusion: This manuscript underscores the importance of personalized surgical planning, timing, techniques and comprehensive postoperative rehabilitation in managing rare and complex hand injuries. Further research is needed to refine management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.