ArticleClinical case reports2026
Septic Peritonitis from Ruptured Pyometra: Case Report and Literature Review.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pyometra, pus within the uterine cavity due to cervical obstruction, is uncommon in postmenopausal women, and spontaneous uterine rupture from pyometra is exceedingly rare but may cause severe peritonitis and sepsis; we report a 57-year-old postmenopausal woman who presented with foul vaginal discharge, progressive lower abdominal pain, fever, hypotension, and ultrasound evidence of turbid intraperitoneal fluid, whose contrast CT demonstrated an endometrial fluid collection with a defect in the posterior uterine wall communicating with the peritoneal cavity; despite initial resuscitation and broad-spectrum antibiotics she deteriorated and underwent urgent exploratory laparotomy, which revealed ~1500 mL of purulent ascites and a 3.0-cm posterior uterine wall perforation, she had a total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and thorough peritoneal lavage, histopathology confirmed necrotizing endometritis/pyometra without malignancy, and her postoperative recovery was uncomplicated with discharge on postoperative day 9; this case highlights the diagnostic challenge of ruptured pyometra, the value of CT when rupture is suspected, and the necessity of early surgical source control combined with antibiotics to improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.