ReviewJournal of translational autoimmunity2026
Autoantibodies in the diagnostics, prognostics and follow-up of primary biliary cholangitis.
Review in Journal of translational autoimmunity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), is a chronic autoimmune liver disease, characterized by cholangiopathy, cholestasis and in the long-term fibrosis, biliary cirrhosis and ultimately end-stage liver disease unless liver transplantation is applied. The diagnostics of PBC is based on biochemical tests, autoantibody measurements and liver histopathology. Abdominal ultrasound, later magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) or endoscopic ultrasound can be effective methods for imaging the intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts. Concerning autoantibodies, anti-mitochondrial (AMA) and PBC-specific antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are the front-line tests that can be identified by indirect immunofluorescence tests or solid-phase immunoassays. AMA and especially the AMA-M2 variant have a high sensitivity and specificity for PBC, while anti-gp210 and anti-sp100 (PBC-specific ANAs) have a lower sensitivity but very high specificity for the disease. Anti-centromere antibodies (ACA) can help in the diagnostics of PBC and some overlap syndromes. Novel emerging markers - anti-hexokinase 1 and anti-Kelch-like 12 protein (anti-KLHL12) - can help the identification of rare AMA- and ANA-negative PBC cases. There is cumulating evidence that beside diagnostics certain autoantibodies can provide information about the prognostics of PBC, can predict therapy response, furthermore, can act as activity marker in follow-up of the patients during therapy. We summarize here the most important data about the accepted and potential clinical applications of traditional and emerging new autoantibodies in PBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.