Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41970206›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2026

Safety and Efficacy of Intra-articular Cell-Free Fat Extract Injection in Patients With Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis.

Kai Xie, Zhuoxuan Jia, Lin Sun, Jiangdong Wu, Xu Jiang, Liao Wang, Songtao Ai, Zhifeng Yu, Wenjie Zhang, Chenglei Liu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kai XieShanghai Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Implants, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8805-7057
Zhuoxuan JiaShanghai Key Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Lin SunShanghai Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Implants, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jiangdong WuShanghai Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Implants, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xu JiangShanghai Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Implants, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Liao WangShanghai Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Implants, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Songtao AiDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zhifeng YuShanghai Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Implants, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Wenjie ZhangShanghai Key Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Chenglei LiuDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zheyuan YuShanghai Key Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Mengning YanShanghai Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Implants, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4495-3351

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cell-free fat extract (CEFFE) has shown promising therapeutic effects on osteoarthritis (OA) in preclinical studies, but its clinical role remains unclear. Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intra-articular autologous CEFFE injections for symptomatic early- and mid-stage knee OA. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A total of 24 participants were randomly allocated to 1 of 4 groups to receive 5 weekly injections of (1) hyaluronic acid (HA, active comparator), (2) low-dose CEFFE (containing 1 mL CEFFE), (3) medium-dose CEFFE (containing 1.5 mL CEFFE), or (4) high-dose CEFFE (containing 2 mL CEFFE). Autologous CEFFE was prepared by spin, emulsification, and filtration after abdominal liposuction, effectively removing lipid and cellular components. Information regarding adverse effects was collected. Routine blood tests, C-reactive protein levels, liver function tests, and kidney function tests were performed at baseline and at the 24-week follow-up to assess systemic toxic effects of CEFFE injection. The clinical effectiveness of CEFFE injections was evaluated using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to detect changes in bone marrow lesions (BMLs) and cartilage loss at baseline and at the final follow-up. Results: All patients received the corresponding injections and were followed up for 24 weeks without serious adverse events or clinically significant laboratory abnormalities. At the final follow-up, the mean WOMAC pain subscale score was 5 ± 1.3 in the HA group, compared with 1.5 ± 1.5, 1.7 ± 1, and 1.8 ± 1.7 in the low-, medium-, and high-dose CEFFE groups, respectively. All 3 CEFFE doses were more effective than an intra-articular HA injection for pain relief and recovery of knee function, as assessed by WOMAC and VAS scores. Semi-quantitative MRI analysis indicated greater improvements in BML in CEFFE-treated participants (57.1%) than in controls (16.7%). None of the research groups exhibited a significant improvement in cartilage loss compared with baseline. Conclusion: CEFFE is an alternative biosafety method for the biological treatment of knee OA, with symptom improvement and BML reduction, and has promising potential for clinical application.

Indexed as

bone marrow lesionscell-free fat extractkneeosteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID41970206
PMCPMC13065288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.