ArticleChinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine2026
Progression of interstitial lung abnormalities and its impact on mortality in patients with lung cancer resection.
Article in Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) are incidental abnormal lung findings on computed tomography that can co-exist with lung cancer, but risk factors for their progression and impact on survival after lung cancer resection remain unclear. This study aimed to identify risk factors for ILA progression, develop a radiomics-based model to predict it, and evaluate the association between ILA progression and mortality. Methods: Patients with ILAs who underwent lung cancer resection in Shanghai Chest Hospital between January 2016 and May 2019 were retrospectively selected and divided into three subcategories at baseline: non-subpleural ILAs, subpleural non-fibrotic ILAs, and subpleural fibrotic ILAs; and three subcategories during follow-up: improved ILAs, unchanged ILAs, and progressive ILAs. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify clinical and laboratory risk factors associated with ILA progression, and radiomics-based machine learning models were independently constructed to predict ILA progression using baseline CT imaging features. Survival data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: There were 1363 ILA cases among 10,295 patients who underwent primary lung cancer resection, with a proportion of 13.24%. After 2- and 4-year follow-up, the progression rates of ILAs were 9.86% (65/659) and 10.19% (43/422), respectively. Subpleural fibrotic ILAs (2-year follow-up: OR = 6.078, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.633-14.028, Conclusions: ILA progression occurs in about 10% of patients after lung cancer resection and is associated with higher mortality. Subpleural fibrotic ILAs and radiotherapy are key risk factors for progression. Radiomics features effectively predict ILA progression, enabling early identification of high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.