ArticleInnovation in aging2026
Single-task, dual-task, and community gait speeds of older adults in Singapore: their associations with frailty, cognition, and age-friendly cities.
Article in Innovation in aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Gait speed (GS) is a powerful measure of older adult health and mobility. Although laboratory GS is easy to obtain through clinical tests, it only reflects capacity and not actual performance. Conversely, community GS is challenging to obtain but holds ecological relevance for health-related policy and applications. This study investigates the relationship between single-task and dual-task laboratory GSs and community GS and further tests their comparative relationships with physical and cognitive health. Research Design and Methods: Community-dwelling older adults aged ≥50 years ( Results: Findings show that although the two laboratory GSs were significantly correlated with community GS, the single-task GS had significantly stronger associations. At the same time, each laboratory test has distinct functions, with single-task GS showing significant association with physical frailty, and dual-task GS, with cognitive impairment. Community GS remains crucial for urban planning of accessibility to transport and services. Discussion and Implications: We conclude that despite being significantly correlated, all three GSs serve distinct purposes and should be used in the right context to optimize impact and application-community GS for policy making, single-task GS for frailty assessments, and dual-task GS for cognitive assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.