ArticleData in brief2026
Labelled IoT flow-based network traffic dataset for cyberattack detection.
Article in Data in brief, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Labelled IoT flow-based network traffic dataset for cyberattack detection.Data in brief · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This data article presents a labelled flow-based network traffic dataset collected from a controlled Internet of Things (IoT) laboratory environment. The dataset captures network communication generated by Raspberry Pi-based IoT nodes configured to emulate service and client roles. Traffic was recorded during normal operations and during the execution of predefined cyberattack scenarios within an isolated experimental network. Network traffic was recorded at the packet level using passive network monitoring and stored in PCAPNG format. The packet captures were subsequently processed into bidirectional network flows, producing flow records with statistical and temporal attributes derived from the observed packet exchanges. Cyberattack-related flows were labelled using the experimental ground-truth markers recorded during each attack campaign, complemented by the fixed attacker node IP address. Flows outside the marked intervals were labelled as benign and corresponded to regular device communication. This combined labelling approach reduces the potential for overlap between benign and attack activities. The dataset covers nine attack scenarios grouped into six attack categories. It is released through a structured repository containing raw packet captures, labelled flow files, and supporting metadata for flow-based IoT traffic analysis, cyberattack detection research, and optional re-labelling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.