Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41970154›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Scoping Review of Current Evidence.

Alexander Ponce, Peter Nguyen, Jonathan Reves

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexander PonceGeneral Surgery, Central Surgical Associates, Jackson, USA.
Peter NguyenPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, William Carey University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Hattiesburg, USA.
Jonathan RevesInternal Medicine, Mississippi Baptist Medical Center, Jackson, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a chronic pain condition characterized by sensory, autonomic, and motor disturbances that can lead to significant functional impairment and decreased quality of life. The pathophysiology of CRPS is multifactorial and involves central and peripheral sensitization, autonomic dysfunction, and neurogenic inflammation. Current management for CRPS consists of pharmacologic medications for pain as well as injections and physical therapy. Physical therapy is a type of manual medicine that serves as a means of neuromodulation for pain to help patients suffering from CRPS maintain functionality and quality of life. Osteopathic manipulative therapy is another type of manual medicine whose theorized mechanisms seem to make it eligible for potential treatment of CRPS. The objective of this article is to evaluate and synthesize the available evidence regarding the use of osteopathic manipulative treatment for CRPS. A literature search was conducted utilizing MEDLINE/PubMed, Semantic Scholar, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov research databases. Articles were included if they involved patients with CRPS being treated with osteopathic manipulative treatments. A total of 404 articles were initially identified, of which four met the inclusion criteria. A risk of bias assessment was performed for the included studies. This scoping review found that evidence supporting the use of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) for CRPS remains limited and heterogeneous. Further research utilizing larger, higher powered studies with standardized protocols and outcomes is required to define the potential role of OMT for patients with CRPS.

Indexed as

complex regional pain syndromecrpsommomtosteopathic manipulative treatment

Identifiers

PMID41970154
PMCPMC13066704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.