ReviewCureus2026
Costoclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Upper Limb Procedures: A Narrative Review of Efficacy and Safety.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regional anesthesia techniques for upper limb surgery continue to evolve to improve block reliability while minimizing approach-specific complications. This narrative review evaluates the efficacy and safety of the costoclavicular brachial plexus block, a modified infraclavicular approach that targets the clustered cords of the brachial plexus lateral to the axillary artery. The objective is to synthesize current evidence on clinical performance, analgesic outcomes, and complications in upper limb procedures. A structured literature review of studies published between 2015 and 2025 was conducted using major medical databases, including randomized trials, observational studies, systematic reviews, and relevant anatomical investigations. The evidence demonstrates that the costoclavicular block provides reliable surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia for distal and intermediate upper limb procedures, with high success rates and predictable onset under ultrasound guidance. Continuous catheter techniques further extend its analgesic utility. A consistent and clinically significant finding is the lower incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis compared with interscalene and supraclavicular blocks, supporting its use in patients with limited respiratory reserve. Complication rates, including vascular puncture and neurological injury, are low and comparable to other infraclavicular techniques. Although the block alone may not provide complete anesthesia for extensive shoulder surgery, it offers a safe, efficient, and diaphragm-sparing alternative for a wide range of upper limb procedures. This review supports the costoclavicular approach as an important component of contemporary, anatomy-based regional anesthesia practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.