ArticleCureus2026
Oral Hygiene Practices and Use of Preventive Dental Products Among Six-Year-Old Children at School Entry: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Appropriate oral hygiene practices established in early childhood are essential for preventing dental caries. Parental awareness and supervision during the early school years play a key role in the development of effective daily oral hygiene habits. However, data on oral hygiene practices and the use of preventive dental products among children at school entry remain limited in many primary healthcare settings. Materials and methods This cross-sectional study included 307 six-year-old children who attended routine school-entry dental examinations at the Department of Dentistry, Public Health Institution "Health Center" Živinice, Bosnia and Herzegovina, between September 2022 and September 2024. Parents completed a structured questionnaire on the timing of the child's first dental visit, initiation of toothbrushing, caregiver involvement in daily oral hygiene, and use of mechanical and chemical oral hygiene products. Categorical variables were summarized using descriptive statistics, and differences in questionnaire responses were analyzed using the Pearson Chi-square (χ²) test, with a significance level of p < 0.05. Results Delayed initiation of the first dental visit and toothbrushing were commonly reported. Only a minority of children attended their first dental visit following eruption of the first tooth, while most began brushing after eruption of several primary teeth. Parental supervision of oral hygiene was inconsistent, and independent brushing from the beginning was reported in a subset of children. Although regular toothbrush and toothpaste use was nearly universal, the use of adjunctive preventive products was limited, and more than half of parents were unaware of the fluoride content of their children's toothpaste. Conclusion Oral hygiene practices among six-year-old children appear suboptimal, with delayed initiation of preventive care and limited parental awareness of fluoride use. Educational interventions aimed at improving caregiver knowledge and supervision of children's oral hygiene practices may support the development of more effective preventive behaviors at school entry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.