Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41970119›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Perspectives of Anatomy Education Among Osteopathic Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Robert J Heins, Matthew Mindrup, Justine Hemaya, Sara S Sloan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robert J HeinsDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, Kansas City University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Kansas City, USA.
Matthew MindrupDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, Kansas City University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Kansas City, USA.
Justine HemayaDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, Kansas City University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Kansas City, USA.
Sara S SloanDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, Kansas City University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Kansas City, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Anatomy education is a foundational component of osteopathic medical training and contributes to clinical development. While prior studies have examined objective outcomes of anatomy curricular change, osteopathic medical students' perceptions of anatomy education, including perceived retention, licensure preparedness, and influence on career interests, remain incompletely characterized. Methods A 30-question electronic survey was distributed to second-, third-, and fourth-year osteopathic medical students in the United States between October 2024 and March 2025. Survey domains included didactic and laboratory anatomy instruction, perceived retention of anatomical knowledge, perceived preparedness for the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination (COMLEX) Level 1 and the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1, and perceived influence on specialty interests. Descriptive statistics and nonparametric tests were used for analysis. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all survey items. Nonparametric tests were used for group comparisons. The Kruskal-Wallis test was applied for comparisons across three groups, and the Mann-Whitney U test for two-group comparisons. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Results Of 125 respondents, 116 met the inclusion criteria. Most respondents perceived their anatomy education as valuable and relevant to their training. Many reported moderate or greater perceived retention of anatomical knowledge more than one year after instruction, with no significant differences across class years. Students who perceived greater value in their anatomy education were more likely to report feeling prepared for licensure examinations. Perceived preparedness was higher for COMLEX Level 1 than for USMLE Step 1. Students pursuing surgical specialties reported a greater perceived influence of anatomy education on career interests compared with those pursuing nonsurgical fields. Conclusion Osteopathic medical students commonly perceive anatomy education as valuable and relevant, though perceptions of retention, licensure preparedness, and career influence vary. These findings reflect learner perceptions rather than objective outcomes and may inform future hypothesis-generating research and curricular considerations in osteopathic medical education. Considerations may include the integration of clinically oriented instruction, longitudinal reinforcement of anatomical concepts, and innovative teaching strategies to enhance learner engagement and perceived relevance.

Indexed as

anatomy educationmedical education researchmedical licensure examinationosteopathic medical educationpreclinical medical education

Identifiers

PMID41970119
PMCPMC13067295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.